Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42737151›Full record

ArticlePolymers2026

Closing the Polyurethane Loop: Repolyols from Chemically Recycled Bio-Modified Foams for Viscoelastic Applications.

Michał Kucała, Elżbieta Malewska, Maria Kurańska, Aleksander Prociak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michał KucałaDepartment of Chemistry and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, CUT Doctoral School, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-9636-9997
Elżbieta MalewskaDepartment of Chemistry and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4638-6581
Maria KurańskaDepartment of Chemistry and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland.
Aleksander ProciakDepartment of Chemistry and Technology of Polymers, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Cracow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article develops new-generation viscoelastic polyurethane foams (VPUFs) obtained using repolyols derived from chemically recycled flexible foams and bio-based polyurethane foams, in accordance with the Circular Economy framework. The repolyols were produced by chemolysis using a low-molecular-weight glycolyzing agent. The repolyols were used as a partial substitute for conventional petrochemical polyols in VPUF formulations. The physicochemical properties of the repolyols, including hydroxyl value (HV), amine value (AmV), and viscosity, were characterized. The effect of the repolyols on the foaming reaction and the cellular structure of the resulting foams was assessed. The resulting VPUFs were tested for apparent density, hardness, hysteresis, resilience, recovery time, and comfort factor. Replacing up to 15% by weight of conventional petrochemical polyols with repolyols results in VPUF with 36% higher apparent density, 32% higher hardness and 27% higher hysteresis than REF. The developed polyurethane foams are in line with the principles of sustainable development and the Circular Economy.

Indexed as

bio-foamsCircular Economyflexible foamsrepolyolsviscoelastic polyurethane foams

Identifiers

PMID42737151
PMCPMC13568188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.