Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42737143›Full record

ReviewPolymers2026

Assessing Polymer Biodegradability: Standardized Methods, Critical Challenges, and Future Directions.

Sarah Opinca-Tuef, Ioana Cristina Benea, Anamaria Todea, Ani Paloyan, Ioan Bîtcan, Francisc Péter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah Opinca-TuefBiocatalysis and Green Chemistry Group, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University Politehnica Timișoara, Vasile Pârvan 6, 300223 Timișoara, Romania.
Ioana Cristina BeneaBiocatalysis and Green Chemistry Group, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University Politehnica Timișoara, Vasile Pârvan 6, 300223 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0009-0000-6999-8081
Anamaria TodeaBiocatalysis and Green Chemistry Group, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University Politehnica Timișoara, Vasile Pârvan 6, 300223 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-103X
Ani PaloyanScientific and Production Center "Armbiotechnology", National Academy of Science of Armenia, Yerevan 0056, Armenia.ORCID 0000-0003-0279-2104
Ioan BîtcanBiocatalysis and Green Chemistry Group, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University Politehnica Timișoara, Vasile Pârvan 6, 300223 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7609-8735
Francisc PéterBiocatalysis and Green Chemistry Group, Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, University Politehnica Timișoara, Vasile Pârvan 6, 300223 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7248-2641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of biodegradable polymers has intensified the need for reliable, standardized methodologies that can accurately assess their environmental fate. However, biodegradability is not an intrinsic property of materials, but rather the result of complex interactions between polymer chemistry, physicochemical characteristics, environmental conditions, and microbial activity. Consequently, biodegradation performance determined under one set of conditions cannot be directly extrapolated to other environments, highlighting the importance of selecting appropriate testing methodologies. This review provides a comprehensive and critical evaluation of the main international standards used to assess polymer biodegradability, including ISO, ASTM, EN, and OECD methods applicable to soil, industrial composting, freshwater, and marine environments. It discusses the fundamental mechanisms of polymer biodegradation, together with the major factors governing degradation kinetics, and comparatively analyzes the biodegradation behavior of polyesters, polysaccharides, polyamides, and polyesteramides across different environmental compartments. Unlike previous reviews, this work critically compares the applicability, strengths, limitations, and biodegradation endpoints of standardized methodologies, identifies current methodological gaps, and proposes a practical decision-making framework for selecting appropriate tests according to the intended end-of-life scenario of polymeric materials. Finally, it highlights the need for more harmonized and environmentally relevant testing approaches to better distinguish compostability from true environmental biodegradability.

Indexed as

ASTM standardsbiodegradable polymersbiodegradationcompostabilityenvironmental assessmentfreshwaterISO standardsmarine biodegradationsoil biodegradationstandardized methods

Identifiers

PMID42737143
PMCPMC13568370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.