ArticlePolymers2026
Enzymatic Versus Energy-Based Degradation of the Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Macromolecule: A Comparative Physicochemical Study of Hyaluronidase, Focused Ultrasound and Laser Irradiation.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a high-molecular-weight glycosaminoglycan whose cross-linked hydrogels are widely used as injectable fillers; their controlled degradation is clinically important but, in practice, achievable only enzymatically with hyaluronidase. Here we compared the enzymatic, ultrasonic and photothermal degradation of a single cross-linked HA macromolecular network and characterised the resulting structural, thermal and chromatographic changes. A cross-linked HA hydrogel (Regenyal Idea, 25 mg/mL) was embedded in an ex vivo porcine skin matrix and treated in six groups: untreated control; hyaluronidase; microfocused ultrasound (7 MHz, 3 mm focal depth); and irradiation with 1064 nm Nd:YAG, diode or alexandrite lasers. Degradation was characterised by FT-IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). FT-IR showed retention of the HA backbone with partial loss of the cross-linked network, while TGA revealed treatment-dependent decreases in thermal stability. By HPLC, hyaluronidase released the most soluble HA (58.2 ± 2.9% at day 1; ~88% plateau by day 2). Among the energy-based methods, only the 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser produced comparable degradation (57.3 ± 5.2%), whereas microfocused ultrasound, the diode and the alexandrite lasers released little soluble HA (3.2-5.3%). The wavelength dependence is consistent with a water-mediated photothermal scission of the HA chains. These findings identify long-pulsed 1064 nm irradiation as an effective non-enzymatic route to degrade the cross-linked hyaluronic acid macromolecule, with hyaluronidase remaining the reference standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.