ArticlePolymers2026
Tailored Flax-Reinforced Composites: Properties and Sustainable Applications.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tailored flax-reinforced composites (TFRC) are being investigated as a sustainable alternative to conventional glass- and carbon-fiber-reinforced composites, having a lower fiber volume than these and the structure of the laminate with two plies (two identical layers of alkali-treated flax yarns) is unidirectional, weakly twisted, oriented at ±45°, and reinforced by stitching; it is also impregnated with bio-resin and has robust reinforcement through controlled lamination. TFRC has shear-dominated behavior under both tensile and compressive loading, due to the off-axis orientation of the fibers, but the damage evolution differs significantly. Under tensile loading, the material exhibits a lower strength (55.2 MPa), whereas under compression loading, the composite achieves a higher apparent strength (99.1 MPa). The paper provides a comprehensive analysis for structural and mechanical characterization using the following: nondestructive evaluation using ultrasound to detect internal discontinuities and assess homogeneity; optical microscopy to evaluate fiber-matrix integration and porosity reduction; and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis to assess thermomechanical transitions and storage modulus stability. Finite element simulations have been used to determine elastic properties and validate the matrix-dominated shear response. The results confirm that the [±45°]
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.