ArticlePolymers2026
Sustainable Rubberized RCC Using Locally Sourced Waste Rubber Tire Powder and GGBFS-Based Binder.
Article in Polymers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates roller-compacted concrete (RCC) in which fine aggregate was replaced with waste rubber tire powder (WRTP) at 0-16% by volume, using a binder containing 40% ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBFS). Fresh, mechanical, transport-related, microstructural, and environmental aspects were evaluated. While WRTP reduced workability, density, and ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), UPV values remained within the "excellent" classification range. Among the investigated mixtures, 2% WRTP provided the most favorable overall performance, increasing the 28-day compressive strength from 26.6 to 28.2 MPa, the 90-day compressive strength from 31.1 to 37.8 MPa, the flexural strength from 3.33 to 3.47 MPa, and the splitting tensile strength from 1.81 to 2.37 MPa. The 2% WRTP mixture also reduced the secondary capillary absorption coefficient by approximately 32.3%, from 0.00127 to 0.00086 mm/√s. Higher WRTP contents progressively decreased compressive strength and static modulus of elasticity, whereas flexural strength was comparatively less affected. SEM/EDS observations revealed more pronounced interfacial voids and discontinuities at higher WRTP contents, consistent with the observed performance decline. A simplified cradle-to-gate embodied-carbon assessment indicated that the 40% GGBFS binder substitution was the primary contributor to the estimated carbon reduction, with the reference and 2% WRTP mixtures exhibiting approximately 33.4% and 33.1% lower embodied carbon, respectively, than the hypothetical cement-only RCC baseline. In addition, the 2% WRTP mixture incorporated 6.43 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.