ArticleMedicine2026
A 20-year bibliometric analysis of patellofemoral pain syndrome: Current trends and research hotspots (2005-2025).
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is one of the most common and clinically challenging knee disorders and has become a hotspot in orthopedics, sports science, and rehabilitation. The pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of PFPS remain controversial. Global academic studies in PFPS continue to grow, with a steady increase in related research. Although most articles consist of clinical studies or systematic literature reviews, analyses of research hotspots remain limited. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current status and research hotspots in PFPS, offering insights for future research and practical applications.
methodsPublications related to PFPS from 2005 to 2025 were collected from the Web of Science Core Collection database. Data were analyzed and visualized through scientific quantitative and qualitative methods using Microsoft Excel, SPSS Statistics 27, Tableau, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Scimago Graphica.
resultsA total of 1022 papers were identified. The United States contributed the most publications (333 articles). The annual number of publications and average citation counts showed an overall increasing trend, with the highest number of articles published in 2022. The article with the highest number of citations was "Patellofemoral pain" written by Willy, RW in 2019, with 182 citations. The International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy was the journal that published the most articles on this topic. The University System of Ohio was the most productive institution, and Rathleff, MS was the most published author. Collaborative network analysis showed strong cooperation among researchers from leading countries and institutions. Research hotspots include knee, kinematics, anterior knee pain, hip, biomechanics, reliability, pain, osteoarthritis, strength, and females. The increase in keyword citations appears to be shifting toward clinical applications, including terms such as randomized controlled trials, therapy, and patterns.
conclusionOur research has found that the number of PFPS publications and citations has increased significantly since 2019, indicating that the field is moving toward greater complexity. The emerging keywords, such as randomized controlled trial, therapy, and patterns, highlight the shift toward clinical application in this field. This study provides new ideas for scholars and is conducive to further exploration of research directions in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.