ArticleMedicine2026
Acute bowel ischemia in the absence of radiological findings: A case for endoscopy.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleIn cases of suspected acute mesenteric ischemia, current guidelines recommend computed tomography angiography as the initial diagnostic modality, with direct laparoscopy advised in uncertain cases. However, the occurrence of nontherapeutic laparoscopies remains a clinical concern. Notably, endoscopy is not yet incorporated into standard diagnostic algorithms. PATIENT CONCERNS: Here, we report the case of a 73-year-old man admitted to the intensive care unit in septic shock. Laboratory tests showed markedly elevated inflammatory markers, creatine kinase, and lactate levels. His medical history included a large chronic left-sided inguinoscrotal hernia, which was reducible and painless at admission. Both clinical symptoms and radiological findings were inconclusive for bowel ischemia. DIAGNOSES: Since both clinical symptoms and radiological findings were unspecific, endoscopy was performed, and identified transmural bowel ischemia, highlighting its potential role as a valuable, minimally invasive tool in the diagnostic pathway for intestinal ischemia.
interventionsIn uncertain cases, current guidelines recommend diagnostic laparotomy to diagnose bowel ischemia. However, unnecessary or nontherapeutic laparotomies are a serious concern, which can lead to morbidity and even death. Gastrointestinal endoscopy is a common procedure available worldwide. Despite its safety and availability, it is not mentioned in the current guidelines for the diagnosis of bowel ischemia. OUTCOMES AND LESSONS: Although the patient died due to his several comorbidities, this case demonstrates that endoscopy can detect intestinal ischemia even when radiological findings are inconclusive. This case clearly suggests that endoscopy should be incorporated into the diagnostic algorithm in patients with suspected mesenteric ischemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.