ArticleNeurological research and practice2026
Neurological and neuroimaging sequelae of lightning injury: a retrospective study and literature review.
Article in Neurological research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLightning injuries (LI) can affect multiple organs, including the peripheral and central nervous system (CNS). Neuroimaging studies in LI are scarce, and it is unknown whether off-target changes in the CNS occur.
methodsRetrospective review of patients who were treated in two neurology tertiary referral centers for sequelae of LI between 2004-2024 and had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) of the CNS. A narrative literature search was performed to identify other studies on neuroimaging after LI.
resultsOf 31 patients (39% female, median age 38 years), 30 had cranial neuroimaging (28 had cranial MRI, five cranial CT), and 14 spinal MRI. The median delay between LI and first neuroimaging was 67 days. Cranial MRI or CT showed two cases of brain edema, one accompanied by subarachnoid bleeding, one case of laminar cortical necrosis after resuscitation, and one case with hyperintensities in the hippocampi. 14 patients with cranial MRI had unspecific white matter lesions. In six of 14 patients who received a spinal MRI, intramedullary spinal cord lesions were found. A review of 54 published patients revealed pathological neuroimaging in 24 (44%) cases. Main findings were hypoxic encephalopathy after cardiac arrest, intracerebral bleeding, cerebral ischemia, brain edema and subarachnoid bleeding.
interpretationTypical neuroimaging findings after LI include brain edema, intracerebral or subarachnoid bleeding, ischemia, hypoxic encephalopathy, and intramedullary spinal cord lesions. Moreover, brain white matter lesions are common, which are of unknown significance, since clinical correlates are rare and pre-existing pathologies often cannot be ruled out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.