Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42736536›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2026

Comparative gliding performance of Anolis lizards among three Caribbean ecomorphs.

Erik Andrew Sathe, Robert Dudley

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erik Andrew SatheDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, USA. eksathe@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7245-9900
Robert DudleyDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anole lizards (genus Anolis) have repeatedly and independently occupied arboreal niches, and in parallel have evolved associated morphologies and locomotor behaviors. In arboreal vertebrates more generally, parachuting and gliding have frequently evolved in response to selective pressure for targeting and controlled landings during either falls or intentional jumps. Here we describe morphological features and aerial performance among five anole species representing the trunk-ground, trunk-crown, and crown giant ecomorphs. Aerial behavior within a vertical wind tunnel was used to evaluate gliding performance, including body orientation, velocity, and glide angle. All study species exhibited controlled non-equilibrium aerial descent. When accounting for phylogenetic relatedness among species, heavier species exhibited greater downward velocities and glide angles. Interspecifically, glide angles were also inversely correlated with wing loading. By contrast, gliding performance did not differ significantly among the three Anolis ecomorphs. Overall, that all study species engaged in controlled aerial descent despite exhibiting substantial morphological variation and being phylogenetically distant within the genus. These results suggest that controlled aerial behaviors may be widespread within Anolis, and that morphological differentiation among species may derive in part from selection for locomotor performance in the air.

Indexed as

Flight, AnimalLizardsLocomotionAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCaribbean RegionPhylogenyAerial locomotionArborealityBiomechanicsControlled aerial descentGliding

Identifiers

PMID42736536
PMCPMC13576313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.