Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42736528›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2026

Prediction Model for Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Patients with Spine Fracture: Can Machine Learning be Used to Improve Current Standards?

Maor Shir, Ariel Sacknovitz, Matthew Blakley, Bar Shir, Moshe Serwatien, Harshadkumar A Patel, Merritt D Kinon, John V Wainwright

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maor ShirSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA. mshir2@student.nymc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4568-6237
Ariel SacknovitzSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Matthew BlakleySchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Bar ShirDepartment of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Moshe SerwatienSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Harshadkumar A PatelSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Merritt D KinonSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
John V WainwrightSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe APACHE-IV is the gold standard for ICU mortality prediction across a multitude of patient conditions. We aim to create a machine learning model to predict ICU mortality for patients with spine fracture with similar predictive capabilities as the APACHE-IV, but with fewer inputs. STUDY

designThe MIMIC-IV and the eICU databases were queried for patients admitted to the ICU with a spine fracture. Demographics and physiological variables of each patient's first day of ICU admission were collected. Variables with > 10% missing values were excluded, while others were imputed using K-nearest-neighbors (k = 5). Feature selection using MIMIC-IV was performed by training an initial Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. Eight features were selected using gain: systolic blood pressure, fiO

resultsA total of 926 patients with spine fracture in MIMIC-IV were included, with a mortality rate of 6.6%. A total of 571 patients with spinal fracture in the eICU database were included, with a mortality rate of 6.7%. Our trained XGBoost model achieved an external test area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.90), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.10-0.36), and Brier score of 0.041, compared with the APACHE-IV model of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91), 0.23 (95% CI: 0.11-0.38), and 0.044, respectively.

conclusionsWe developed an eight-variable XGBoost model to predict mortality for patients with spine fracture that performed similarly to the 37-variable APACHE-IV score when applied to a study population from the eICU dataset. Although the APACHE-IV is the most robust method for ICU mortality scoring, novel methods utilizing machine learning guided feature selection should be explored given the potential to simplify and improve on the proprietary APACHE-IV system.

Indexed as

Intensive care unitMachine learningSpine fracture

Identifiers

PMID42736528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.