ArticleNeurocritical care2026
Prediction Model for Intensive Care Unit Mortality in Patients with Spine Fracture: Can Machine Learning be Used to Improve Current Standards?
Article in Neurocritical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe APACHE-IV is the gold standard for ICU mortality prediction across a multitude of patient conditions. We aim to create a machine learning model to predict ICU mortality for patients with spine fracture with similar predictive capabilities as the APACHE-IV, but with fewer inputs. STUDY
designThe MIMIC-IV and the eICU databases were queried for patients admitted to the ICU with a spine fracture. Demographics and physiological variables of each patient's first day of ICU admission were collected. Variables with > 10% missing values were excluded, while others were imputed using K-nearest-neighbors (k = 5). Feature selection using MIMIC-IV was performed by training an initial Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. Eight features were selected using gain: systolic blood pressure, fiO
resultsA total of 926 patients with spine fracture in MIMIC-IV were included, with a mortality rate of 6.6%. A total of 571 patients with spinal fracture in the eICU database were included, with a mortality rate of 6.7%. Our trained XGBoost model achieved an external test area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.90), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.22 (95% CI: 0.10-0.36), and Brier score of 0.041, compared with the APACHE-IV model of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91), 0.23 (95% CI: 0.11-0.38), and 0.044, respectively.
conclusionsWe developed an eight-variable XGBoost model to predict mortality for patients with spine fracture that performed similarly to the 37-variable APACHE-IV score when applied to a study population from the eICU dataset. Although the APACHE-IV is the most robust method for ICU mortality scoring, novel methods utilizing machine learning guided feature selection should be explored given the potential to simplify and improve on the proprietary APACHE-IV system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42736528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.