ArticleSpine deformity2026
Pediatric spine surgeons report high perceived patient mental health burden and limited screening in scoliosis care.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescents seeking treatment for scoliosis often present with comorbid mental health concerns. Yet, standardized screening, evaluation, and care protocols remain lacking. This study examines pediatric orthopedic providers' perceptions of patient mental health burden and screening practices in spine deformity care.
methodsFifty-four pediatric spine surgeons from a multi-center AIS registry were anonymously surveyed. Closed-ended responses were tallied, and sentiment analysis was applied to open-ended responses.
resultsTwenty-eight surgeons (52%) responded, most with over ten years of experience in high-volume practices. Many estimated that up to half of their patients face mental health challenges, noting a slight increase in burden. Despite this, only 12 (42%) reported structured screening (e.g., SRS, PROMIS) and 6 (21%) used informal methods (observations, conversations). Among the 16 (57%) screening, PROMIS and depression/suicide screens were most common. Few reported reliable follow-up: only 2 (7%) indicated their teams "probably" follow up on low scores, while 11 (39%) felt follow-up was unlikely. Most (64%) believed they were not adequately addressing concerns. Referrals were typically prompted by positive screens or observations, but barriers, like limited provider availability, access issues, and insurance constraints, often hindered them. When made, referrals were usually directed in-house.
conclusionSignificant gaps exist in addressing mental health in pediatric scoliosis care. While providers report to recognize the burden, few conduct routine screenings, and follow-up and referrals remain inconsistent. Findings highlight the need for standardized protocols and improved access to mental health resources within scoliosis care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42736508What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.