SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Deep brain stimulation for Tourette syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulatory therapy for patients with refractory Tourette syndrome (TS). Various brain targets-including the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and several thalamic nuclei-have been explored, yet the comparative efficacy of DBS in different targets remain unclear. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of DBS in TS and assess symptom improvements across different stimulation targets. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified studies published between October 2014 and September 2025. Study quality was assessed using the French and Gronseth classification system. Outcomes of interest included pre- and postoperative scores on the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (YBOCS). A total of 22 studies involving 358 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Mean YGTSS scores decreased from 69.19 ± 18.04 preoperatively to 35.88 ± 17.23 postoperatively. There was an average 48% reduction in YGTSS scores. DBS led to a substantial reduction in tic severity (YGTSS: GPi, SMD = 2.29, P < 0.00001; thalamus, SMD = 2.33, P < 0.0001). Within the GPi subgroup, stimulation of the anteromedial GPi (amGPi) resulted in significantly better benefits (SMD = 3.01, P < 0.00001) compared to the posterior-ventrolateral GPi (pvlGPi), which did not reach statistical significance (SMD = 1.23, P = 0.05). YBOCS scores decreased from a mean of 17.38 ± 6.15 preoperatively to 9.16 ± 4.12 postoperatively. The average reduction in YBOCS scores was 47%. Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms also showed significant improvement following DBS (overall YBOCS, SMD = 0.94, P < 0.00001; amGPi, SMD = 1.49, P = 0.004; pvlGPi, SMD = 0.72; P = 0.006). DBS is an effective and target-sensitive intervention for TS, alleviating both motor tics and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Compared to therapies such as pvlGPi and thalamic-DBS, amGPi-DBS may demonstrate greater therapeutic potential compared with pvlGPi-DBS, suggesting its potential advantage in modulating the associated circuits involved in the pathophysiology of TS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42736497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.