ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening from Routine Knee Radiographs Using a Deep Learning-Based Texture-Branch Cross-Attention Network.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study systematically investigates the impact of architectural components on deep learning-based osteoporosis screening using knee radiographs from a single-center archive. A total of 580 posteroanterior and lateral knee radiographs (normal: n = 389; osteoporosis: n = 191) were included. ImageNet-pretrained backbones (ResNet50V2, VGG16, and DenseNet121) were progressively extended with texture channel packages, dual-stream (global + texture) cross-attention fusion, ordinal-aware supervised contrastive loss, and input-conditioned learnable test-time augmentation (L-TTA). All models were evaluated by fivefold stratified cross-validation using the out-of-fold area under the ROC curve (OOF AUC). TBA-Net v1 achieved the highest performance (OOF AUC = 0.8727), exceeding the strongest baseline VGG16 (0.8497) by 0.0230 AUC and ResNet50V2 (0.8101) and DenseNet121 (0.8092) by 0.0626 and 0.0635 AUC. Ablation analysis demonstrated that the texture branch, cross-attention mechanism, and contrastive loss reduced performance when introduced sequentially, but produced a synergistic effect when jointly optimized; a Shapley decomposition showed that this gain arises from the interaction between components rather than from any component alone. L-TTA Net (OOF AUC = 0.8427) generated clinically interpretable attention patterns. At the current dataset scale, performance plateaued at approximately 0.87 OOF AUC, indicating that further improvements are constrained by sampling variability rather than architectural complexity. Architectural components in small medical imaging datasets should be evaluated within a holistic optimization framework rather than in isolation, and learnable test-time augmentation weights provide interpretability beyond predictive performance. The framework is positioned as a triage aid for prioritizing densitometry referral rather than as a substitute for it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42736491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.