Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42736483›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2026

The shared evolutionary capacities of plasmids and extrachromosomal DNA.

Liam P Shaw, Anton G Henssen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liam P ShawSchool of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. liam.shaw@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7332-0820
Anton G HenssenDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Haematology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1534-778X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of evolutionary genetics is based largely on chromosomes, but many organisms harbour extrachromosomal forms of DNA that exist in multiple copies per cell and segregate unequally on division. These alternative carriers of genetic information possess unique evolutionary capacities. Recent research on high-copy bacterial plasmids has established important principles about their role in gene amplification, increased mutational supply and the balance between selection and segregational drift. In human cancer, many tumours contain molecules known as extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) that exhibit strikingly similar dynamics. From an evolutionary perspective, cancer resembles a unicellular organism under strong selective pressure; because asymmetric segregation of ecDNA produces population-level heterogeneity, ecDNA can fulfil a similar evolutionary role to that of plasmids in bacteria. The analogy between plasmids and ecDNA has been noted previously but not explored in depth. Here, we compare their formation, expression, segregation and evolution, elucidate common principles that apply across both, and identify open questions. We propose that both plasmids and ecDNA function as 'contingency loci' that permit rapid adaptation. Despite important differences, we argue that these extrachromosomal genetic elements can be viewed as an example of convergent evolution.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.