SynthesisJournal of clinical apheresis2026
The Optimal Therapeutic Window for Nonbioartificial Liver Support in Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Based on Baseline MELD Score.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical apheresis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
NBALS efficacy in ACLF remains controversial. We aimed to determine if a "therapeutic window" exists by stratifying clinical outcomes based on baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for RCTs and PSM-cohorts comparing NBALS to standard medical therapy (SMT). Primary outcome was 28-day mortality; MELD-stratified subgroup analyses and random-effects meta-regression were performed. Eleven studies (comprising 12 datasets) involving 1958 patients (991 NBALS vs. 967 SMT) were included. Overall, NBALS significantly reduced 28-day mortality compared with SMT (pooled RR 0.72, 95% CI [0.63-0.83], I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.