Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42736423›Full record

ArticleNature nanotechnology2026

Single-gate, multipartite entanglement on a room-temperature quantum register.

Joseph D Minnella, Mathieu Ouellet, Amelia R Klein, Lee C Bassett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature nanotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joseph D MinnellaQuantum Engineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4741-7173
Mathieu OuelletQuantum Engineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0651-4817
Amelia R KleinQuantum Engineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4882-1302
Lee C BassettQuantum Engineering Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. lbassett@engineering.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8729-1530

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) ECCS-2129183National Science Foundation (NSF) OSI-2427091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multipartite entanglement is an essential aspect of quantum systems, needed to execute quantum algorithms, implement error correction and achieve quantum-enhanced sensing. In solid-state quantum registers such as nitrogen-vacancy centres in diamond, entangled states are typically created using sequential, pairwise gates between the central electron and individual nuclear qubits. This sequential approach is slow and suffers from crosstalk errors. Here we demonstrate a parallelized multi-qubit entangling gate to generate a four-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state using a room-temperature nitrogen-vacancy centre in only 14.8 μs-ten times faster than that using sequences of two-qubit gates and close to the fundamental limit set by the hyperfine coupling frequencies. Parallel three-qubit gates are also realized with all-nuclear-qubit subsets. The entangled states are verified by measuring multiple quantum coherences. The four-qubit parallel gate has a fidelity of 0.92(4), whereas the sequential four-qubit gate fidelity is only 0.69(3). The approach is generalizable to other solid-state platforms, and it lays the foundation for scalable generation and control of entanglement in practical devices.

Identifiers

PMID42736423
PMCPMC13661294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.