ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Gut single-microbe landscape in patients with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial communities in the human gut are highly diverse and complex, and many play critical roles in health and disease. Their functioning depends not only on species composition and diversity but also on intra- and intercellular transcriptional dynamics. Robust technologies capable of capturing single-microbe RNA sequencing information are urgently needed to understand microbial heterogeneity and host interactions. In this exploratory study, we applied droplet-based single-microbe RNA sequencing (smRNA-seq2) to analyze gut microbiomes from five patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), five with bipolar disorder (BD), and five healthy participants (HP), generating a transcriptional atlas of 33,174 single microbial cells. Unsupervised clustering based on RNA expression profiles partitioned these cells into 37 distinct clusters, reflecting both taxonomic diversity and intra-species functional heterogeneity. The most dominant clusters were identified as Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans, Phocaeicola dorei, Enterocloster sp000431375, and Clostridium_Q sp003024715. Compositional and transcriptional differences were observed across diagnostic groups, with clustering patterns appearing to be influenced by disease, gender, and age. Functional heterogeneity was evident in oxidative stress and metabolic genes such as sodB, mdh2, and eno2 in Phocaeicola dorei, while stress-response genes (htpG_1, groL, dnaK, clpB) were upregulated in BD. Focusing on the ko03110 pathway (chaperones and folding catalysts), species-specific patterns emerged: Clostridium_Q_sp003024715 was positively associated with health but decreased in disease status; Enterocloster_sp000431375 and Fusicatenibacter saccharivorans were upregulated in BD; and Phocaeicola dorei was downregulated in MDD. Together, these findings suggest the presence of functional and phenotypic heterogeneity within the gut microbiome in mood disorders and identify exploratory microbial transcriptomic features that may be associated with group-level differences, warranting further validation in larger cohorts.
Identifiers
42736349What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.