Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42736315›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A decade of evaluating burnout among American medical students using the OLBI-MS.

Leah Teresa Rosen, Richard Friedman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leah Teresa RosenWeill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA. ltrosen@mednet.ucla.edu.
Richard FriedmanDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burnout among physicians is a growing concern, particularly during recent years in the setting of the Covid-19 pandemic. Recently, greater attention has been paid to researching physician burnout and its downstream effects (i.e. depression, suicidality); however, a majority of this research has focused on resident and attending physician populations. Medical students are a similarly vulnerable population, but the literature on medical student burnout is limited. Specifically, there is no existing literature that evaluates the trend of medical student burnout over recent years, particularly since the Covid-19 pandemic-a time when students navigated challenges related to their clinical experiences and virtual coursework. The aim of this study is to better understand the prevalence of feelings of burnout among American medical students, and evaluate the trend since the mid-2010s. Further, this study aims to compare average burnout scores among 2nd and 4th year medical students, to analyze the relationship between academic year and feelings of exhaustion and disengagement. We analyzed national data collected from the American Association of Medical Colleges' Year Two and Graduation Questionnaire, each of which includes an Oldenburg Burnout Inventory for Medical Students. We found that since 2014, levels of reported exhaustion have significantly increased among medical students. We also found that between 2nd and 4th year students, the 4th year students have consistently reported lower levels of burnout than their 2nd year counterparts over time. Finally, we also found that burnout scores peaked among 2nd year medical students at the time of the Covid-19 pandemic, and have since trended down. These findings provide an essential understanding of burnout trends among American medical students, and can be utilized to help medical educators plan the timing and objectives of wellness interventions.

Indexed as

Burnout, ProfessionalBurnout, PsychologicalCOVID-19Students, MedicalAdultEmotional ExhaustionFemaleHumansMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42736315
PMCPMC13575098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.