ReviewPoultry science2026
Artificial intelligence in poultry processing: applications, validation gaps, and pathways toward intelligent and autonomous processing systems.
Review in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a transformative tool for poultry processing by enabling rapid, nondestructive, and adaptive interpretation of images, spectra, sensor signals, and production records. This review critically examines AI applications across the poultry-processing chain, including live-bird receiving, slaughter, scalding, defeathering, evisceration, carcass inspection, chilling, antimicrobial control, cut-up, deboning, meat-quality assessment, breast-muscle abnormality detection, further processing, packaging, microbial monitoring, and predictive food-safety management. Particular attention is given to computer vision, machine learning, deep learning, near-infrared and hyperspectral imaging, electronic sensing, multimodal data fusion, robotics, and predictive modeling. Reported studies demonstrate strong potential for defect classification, carcass and portion localization, foreign-material detection, microbial-load estimation, freshness assessment, yield prediction, and process optimization. However, the literature establishes technical feasibility more convincingly than commercial reliability. Many models are developed from small, single-source datasets, use random data partitioning that may permit leakage, rely on uncertain reference labels, or report overall accuracy without class-specific performance, calibration, uncertainty, and external validation. Domain shifts caused by differences among flocks, plants, seasons, equipment, lighting, product orientation, and processing conditions remain major barriers to deployment. AI should therefore be implemented as part of an integrated sensor-model-decision-actuator system rather than as an isolated algorithm or replacement for validated process controls and human expertise. Future progress requires multi-plant datasets, prospective commercial-line testing, uncertainty-aware models, hygienic and low-latency hardware, economic assessment, transparent governance, and clearly defined human oversight. The transition from experimental prediction to intelligent and autonomous poultry processing will depend on whether AI can consistently improve safety, quality, yield, sustainability, and operational decision-making under realistic industrial conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.