ArticlePoultry science2026
Stocking density and dietary inclusion of a multi-component functional feed additive on foot pad dermatitis, welfare indicators, and performance of broiler chickens.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of stocking density (SD) and dietary supplementation of multi-component functional feed additives (PDS) on the performance and welfare-related indicators of broiler chickens. A total of 318 Ross 308 broilers, initial body weight 40.0± 0.9 g were assigned to five treatments: low stocking density (LD; 18 birds/m²), high stocking density (HD; 22 birds/m²), HD + 0.05% PDS (HD1), 0.075% PDS (HD2), or 0.10% PDS (HD3). Each treatment had six replicate pens and the trial lasted 35 d. Broilers under LD showed higher (p< 0.05) final body weight (BW), BW gain (BWG), and lower feed conversion ratio (FCR) than those reared under HD. Within the HD groups, increasing PDS supplementation improved final BW, BWG, and FCR through linear and quadratic responses (p< 0.05). Mortality rate during the finisher phase decreased linearly (p<0.05) with increasing PDS inclusion. High SD increased (p<0.05) FPD score, FPD occurrence, and the proportion of moderate-to-severe lesions, whereas PDS supplementation reduced FPD occurrence and shifted lesion distribution toward milder categories. Footpad appearance also improved progressively with increasing PDS inclusion. Birds under HD showed greater (p<0.05) C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-10 (IL-10), and cortisol than those under LD. Supplementation with PDS resulted in linear reductions (p<0.05) in TNF-α, IL-1β, and cortisol, while CRP showed a tendency toward linear and quadratic responses. High SD increased (p< 0.05) fecal Salmonella, Clostridium, and Escherichia coli populations. Increasing PDS supplementation linearly reduced (p<0.05) Salmonella and Clostridium counts. In addition, HD increased litter moisture and ammonia concentrations compared with LD. In conclusion, high SD impaired broiler performance and welfare, as evidenced by lower growth performance, higher foot pad dermatitis, elevated stress and inflammatory markers, as well as increased pathogenic bacterial populations. Supplementation with PDS (0.05-0.10%) partially mitigated these responses and improved broiler resilience under high-SD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.