ArticlePoultry science2026
Comparative analysis of meat quality, nutritional composition and gut microbiota in different breeds of meat-type quails.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quail meat is favored by consumers because of its low fat and cholesterol contents. In this study, the differences in carcass traits, meat quality, serum biochemical profiles, amino acid and fatty acid profiles, and cecal microbiota among Chinese white feather quail (CWQ), Savimalt meat quail (SMQ), and French giant quail (FGQ) were systematically evaluated. The results revealed that the FGQ and SMQ exhibited significantly greater body weight, carcass weight, and breast muscle weight than the CWQ did (P < 0.05). In addition, the CWQ showed greater lightness (L*) and shear force, whereas the FGQ exhibited greater redness (a*) (P < 0.05). With respect to serum biochemical indices, only the serum albumin and creatinine levels differed among the breeds (P < 0.05). In terms of nutritional composition, the protein and multiple amino acid contents in the breast muscle of the FGQ and SMQ were greater, whereas the C20:4n6 and C22:6n3 contents were greater in the CWQ breast muscle (P < 0.05). Moreover, the crude fat content in the CWQ and FGQ was significantly greater than that in the SMQ (P < 0.05). 16S rRNA sequencing revealed significant differences in cecal microbial community structure among the breeds. Several bacterial genera, including Bifidobacterium and Christensenellaceae_R_7_group, were significantly associated with amino acid composition, fatty acid profiles, and meat quality traits. In conclusion, significant differences in meat quality, nutritional components, and intestinal microbial composition were detected among different breeds of meat-type quails. The findings of this study provide a theoretical basis for the breeding and quality regulation of meat quails.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.