Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42736172›Full record

Observational studyInternational wound journal2026

Early Detection of Deep Tissue Pressure Injury in Intensive Care Using Hemodynamics-Based Machine Learning: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Tuba Sengul, Beren Semiz, Emre Gursoy, Dilek Yilmaz Akyaz, Ayten Dilara Yavuz, Yunus Emre Akyol, Yusuf Ali, Tugba Cevizci, Orhan Zeytun, Violeta Lopez and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tuba SengulSchool of Nursing, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6253-2016
Beren SemizDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7544-5974
Emre GursoyDepartment of Computer Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7676-0167
Dilek Yilmaz AkyazGraduate School of Health Sciences, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7991-3176
Ayten Dilara YavuzDepartment of Computer Engineering, Koç University, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3032-0728
Yunus Emre AkyolKoç University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0222-9234
Yusuf AliKoç University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4406-7221
Tugba CevizciKoç University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1609-0528
Orhan ZeytunKoç University Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8519-2251
Violeta LopezSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8844-0331
Holly Kirkland-KyhnBetty Irene Moore School of Nursing, UC Davis, Sacramento, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-9088

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines factors associated with deep tissue pressure injury and develops interpretable machine learning models for early risk prediction in adult ICU patients. This retrospective observational cohort study included 336 adult intensive care unit patients, of whom 211 developed deep tissue pressure injury and 125 remained pressure injury-free. For patients who developed deep tissue pressure injury, haemodynamic, laboratory and nursing variables from the 24 h before injury onset were analysed using a physiological time-at-risk framework. For pressure injury-free patients, corresponding variables from the first 24 h after intensive care unit admission were used. Six supervised machine learning classifiers were developed and internally validated using cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization. All models showed good predictive performance. Extreme gradient boosting achieved the highest discriminative ability, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.976. The most influential predictors across feature selection methods were low-molecular-weight heparin use, norepinephrine duration, lower blood pressure values, immobility, nutritional risk, antiplatelet therapy and chronic disease profile. Routinely documented nursing and haemodynamic indicators obtained within a clinically relevant 24-h risk window can support accurate early risk stratification for deep tissue pressure injury in adult intensive care unit patients. A physiology-informed and interpretable machine learning approach may improve recognition of patients at imminent risk.

Indexed as

Critical CareEarly DiagnosisHemodynamicsMachine LearningPressure UlcerAdultAgedClassification AlgorithmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective Studiesdeep tissue pressure injuryintensive care unitsmachine learningrisk assessmentwound prevention

Identifiers

PMID42736172
PMCPMC13574721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.