ArticlePharmaceutical statistics
The Impact of Enrollment Strategies on the Performance of Time-To-Event Dose-Escalation Designs for Phase I Drug Combination Oncology Trials.
Article in Pharmaceutical statistics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dose-escalation trials make sequential dosing decisions for cohorts of patients based on accumulating toxicity data, often in the form of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Challenges arise due to the necessity of complete follow-up for accurate dosing decisions. There are many settings where patients may become available to be enrolled before there is complete DLT information from the patients already in the trial. In radiotherapy trials, for example, the DLT assessment window is far longer than traditional chemotherapies and waiting for complete DLT information can result in impractically long trial durations. This issue can be exacerbated in escalation trials of dose-combinations, where the space to be explored and the sample sizes are generally larger. The time-to-event (TITE) approach, which utilizes partial follow-up data, has been effective in reducing trial lengths while ensuring accuracy and safety. Whether TITE methods are beneficial depends critically on the relationship between the DLT assessment window length and patient inter-arrival time, characterized by the assessment-to-interarrival (A/I) ratio. However, the impact of the rate of accrual into the trial and the size of each dosing cohort have not been carefully considered because it is widely assumed that accrual rates will be slow and the A/I ratio will be small. We use comprehensive simulation studies based on a dose-combination case-study and show that accrual rates corresponding to larger A/I ratios can result in poor accuracy and safety, while a dosing cohort size of one can additionally induce unfavorable operating characteristics. To address this issue, we propose a modification to the TITE design where the trial is paused if there are a certain number of non-completers. We demonstrate that this simple modified approach is robust across the range of A/I ratios investigated and has non-inferior operating characteristics to a non-TITE design while providing meaningful reductions in trial duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.