ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2026
Integrated Assessment of Sarcopenia in Patients with Gastric Cancer Using Deep Learning and Radiomics.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSarcopenia is a common condition in patients with gastric cancer that is associated with poor survival and adverse clinical outcomes. Conventional diagnostic approaches are time-consuming, limiting large-scale clinical implementation. This study aimed to develop and validate a multimodal model that integrates clinical variables, radiomics features and deep learning features.
methodsA total of 1067 patients with gastric cancer from two medical centres were included. The diagnosis of sarcopenia required low grip strength and a low skeletal muscle index, whereas severe sarcopenia additionally required low gait speed. Radiomics features were extracted from computed tomography images at the third lumbar vertebral level to construct radiomics models. The 2D and 2.5D deep learning models were developed using the ResNet50 architecture. A transformer-based multimodal model integrating clinical variables, radiomics features and 2.5D deep learning features was developed and termed the sarcopenia model, while an XGBoost fusion model integrating the same three modalities was constructed as a comparator. Model performance was evaluated in the training, validation and external test sets using receiver operating characteristic and decision curve analyses.
resultsAmong the 1067 patients, 782 (73.3%) were male and 285 (26.7%) were female, with no significant difference in gender distribution across the training, validation and external test sets (p = 0.34). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that the overall survival of patients with sarcopenia was significantly worse than that of patients without sarcopenia (p < 0.05). Among single-modality models, the radiomics model achieved AUCs of 0.85 and 0.80 in the validation and external test sets, respectively. The 2.5D deep learning model outperformed the 2D model, yielding AUCs of 0.81 and 0.83 in the validation and external test sets. The XGBoost model achieved AUCs of 0.85 and 0.86 in the validation and external test sets, respectively. In the sarcopenia model, the AUCs for identifying sarcopenia were 0.95, 0.87 and 0.89 in the training, validation and external test sets, respectively, while those for identifying severe sarcopenia were 0.93, 0.85 and 0.84.
conclusionsThe sarcopenia model integrating clinical variables, radiomics features and deep learning features enables the accurate identification of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer and may support clinical screening and risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.