Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42735905›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026

Behavioural Welfare Implications of Human Handling Practices in Zoo Snakes.

Chelsea Kennedy, Sara L Hanson, Connor Walker, Eduardo J Fernandez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chelsea KennedySchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Adelaide University, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7859-6989
Sara L HansonSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Adelaide University, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1792-3797
Connor WalkerSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Adelaide University, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2771-6322
Eduardo J FernandezSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Adelaide University, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5444-6604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHandling reptiles, particularly snakes, is common in ambassador-animal and animal-visitor interaction programmes. However, relatively little is known about the behavioural and welfare impacts of these interactions on snakes.

objectivesThis study examined whether staff-led handling during visitor interactions impacted snake behaviour by comparing before and after handling and between handling and non-handling days.

methodsObservations were conducted at Cleland Wildlife Park (South Australia, Australia) on three individual snakes: one woma python (Aspidites ramsayi) and two Children's pythons (Antaresia childreni). Behavioural data were collected using cameras in ZooMonitor using focal pinpoint sampling and an adapted reptile-based ethogram. Sixteen behaviours were categorised into five behavioural classes: Active, Inactive, Abnormal, Out of sight, and Other. All footage was scored blind to handling conditions.

resultsNo significant differences were detected in active or abnormal behaviour before versus after handling. However, inactive behaviour increased and out of sight behaviour decreased following handling. When handling days were compared with non-handling days, abnormal behaviour was significantly lower on handling days, while no significant differences were detected for behaviours classified as Other.

conclusionsShort-term, staff-led handling during animal-visitor interactions was not associated with substantial changes in snake behaviour. The observed increase in inactive behaviour and decrease in out of sight behaviour following handling may reflect minor short-term behavioural adjustments to human interaction rather than pronounced welfare effects. Overall, these findings suggest that, under the conditions examined, brief handling had limited direct behavioural impacts on the snakes studied. HIGHLIGHTS: Although snakes are commonly displayed in zoos, little is known about proper behavioural welfare for the taxa. Little is also known about the impact of visitor interactions on snakes. We examined the impact of a snake handling interaction on three zoo-housed snakes. Abnormal behavior was lower on handling days while visibility increased following handling, suggesting a neutral to positive welfare effect. Future research should focus on better understanding proper welfare metrics for snakes.

Indexed as

Animals, ZooAnimal WelfareBehavior, AnimalBoidaeSnakesAnimalsHumansSouth Australiaanimal–visitor interactionsbehavioural observationshandling practicesreptile behavioursnake welfare

Identifiers

PMID42735905
PMCPMC13574537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.