Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42735889›Full record

ArticleVirus research2026

An IMS 1313-based inactivated PRV vaccine with a novel immunopotentiator induces robust protective immunity against virulent variants.

Ya-Ting Zheng, Xian-Zhu Jin, Chuan-Jian Zhang, Sai-Sai Chen, Nikolaus Osterrieder, Ya-Mei Liu, Ji-Chun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virus research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ya-Ting ZhengInstitute of Veterinary Immunology & Engineering, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China; National Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Veterinary Biology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China; Jiangsu Coinnovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, 225009, China; GuoTai (Taizhou) Center of Technology Innovation for Veterinary Biology, Taizhou, 225300, China.
Xian-Zhu JinCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China; Nanchang Police Dog Base of the Ministry of Public Security, Nanchang, 330100, China.
Chuan-Jian ZhangInstitute of Veterinary Immunology & Engineering, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China; National Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Veterinary Biology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China; Jiangsu Coinnovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, 225009, China; GuoTai (Taizhou) Center of Technology Innovation for Veterinary Biology, Taizhou, 225300, China.
Sai-Sai ChenInstitute of Veterinary Immunology & Engineering, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China; National Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Veterinary Biology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China; Jiangsu Coinnovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, 225009, China; GuoTai (Taizhou) Center of Technology Innovation for Veterinary Biology, Taizhou, 225300, China.
Nikolaus OsterriederTierärztliche Hochschule Hannover, Bünteweg 2, Hannover, 30559, Germany.
Ya-Mei LiuInstitute of Veterinary Immunology & Engineering, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China; National Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Veterinary Biology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China; Jiangsu Coinnovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, 225009, China; GuoTai (Taizhou) Center of Technology Innovation for Veterinary Biology, Taizhou, 225300, China. Electronic address: lym613@hotmail.com.
Ji-Chun WangInstitute of Veterinary Immunology & Engineering, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China; National Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Veterinary Biology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, 210014, China; Jiangsu Coinnovation Center for Prevention and Control of Important Animal Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses, Yangzhou, 225009, China; GuoTai (Taizhou) Center of Technology Innovation for Veterinary Biology, Taizhou, 225300, China. Electronic address: 19970021@jaas.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPseudorabies virus (PRV) variants have emerged as major swine pathogens associated with high piglet mortality and reproductive losses in China since 2011. Conventional oil-adjuvant vaccines are effective but frequently induce adverse local reactions. Water-soluble adjuvants, such as the nano-adjuvant IMS 1313, confer improved safety and potent immunogenicity. This study aimed to develop an inactivated PRV vaccine based on IMS 1313 combined with an immunopotentiator and evaluate its immune protective efficacy.

methodsMultiple adjuvant-immunopotentiator combinations were screened. The PRV LA1206-80 strain formulated with IMS 1313 plus immunopotentiator c exhibited the optimal comprehensive performance and was selected for subsequent evaluation. Mice were immunized to detect serum neutralizing antibody titers and survival-based protection rates. Piglets were immunized via intramuscular or intradermal routes, and immune responses, post-challenge viral shedding, as well as histopathological lesions were monitored. Oil-adjuvant inactivated vaccine and live attenuated vaccine were set as control groups. Virus neutralization assays were performed to determine neutralizing antibody responses.

resultsAfter two immunizations with a 28-day interval, the IMS 1313 + immunopotentiator c formulation induced a neutralizing antibody titer of 1:32 and achieved 93.3 % protection in mice, which was markedly higher than that of the control groups (1:5.6). In this preliminary exploratory piglet trial, intramuscular vaccination yielded peak neutralizing antibody titers of 1:295.8, which appeared higher than those of the oil‑adjuvant vaccine (1:28.2) and live vaccine (1:13.1). This immunization regimen achieved 100 % survival, accompanied by reduced viral shedding and minimal pathological lesions. Intradermal vaccination conferred relatively lower protective efficacy, underscoring the critical influence of immunization route.

conclusionIMS 1313 combined with immunopotentiator c markedly enhances the immunogenicity and safety profile of inactivated PRV vaccines in mice. Preliminary data from piglets revealed favourable protective trends upon intramuscular vaccination. This candidate represents a promising safer alternative compared with conventional oil-adjuvant vaccines and warrants further larger-scale efficacy evaluation.

Indexed as

Immune protectionImmunopotentiatorIMS 1313Inactivated vaccineNano-adjuvantNeutralizing antibodyPseudorabies virus

Identifiers

PMID42735889
PMCPMC13634121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.