ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2027
Modeling hepatitis D virus kinetics during bulevirtide monotherapy: challenges and solutions.
Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The entry inhibitor Bulevirtide (BLV) was recently approved in Europe and the United States for treatment of chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection, which is considered the most severe form of viral hepatitis infection. It is well established that a model that incorporates free virus and infected cells, but assumes fixed target cell number , is limited to predicting a monophasic viral decline for antiviral agents that act solely to block viral entry or infection. We investigated a recently published fixed target cell model against clinical data from HDV-infected individuals treated with BLV monotherapy for up to 96 weeks using non-linear mixed effects modelling (NLME). We found that although estimated parameters in the fixed target cell model had relative standard errors (RSE) below 50%, suggesting acceptable precision, the model failed to reproduce the non-monophasic HDV kinetic patterns observed in most patients. Consequently, the fixed target cell model led to inaccurate predictions of the treatment duration required to reach a theoretical cure boundary, defined as less than 1 virion in the patient's total extracellular body fluid. Furthermore, the model was unable to account for viral breakthrough, characterized by an initial decline followed by an increase in the virus during therapy, and incorrectly predicted that viral load will remain unchanged after treatment cessation. Lastly, we showed that a model that includes target cell dynamics can explain non-monophasic HDV decline patterns such as biphasic, flat-partial response and viral breakthrough. Including target cell dynamics also predicted a viral rebound once BLV is stopped as observed in clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42735818What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.