ArticleESMO open2026
Tumor genomic landscape of older patients with metastatic breast cancer
Article in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetastatic breast cancer (MBC) in older patients has distinct clinical and histologic characteristics. Elucidating the genomic basis of MBC helps identify potential therapeutic targets to improve outcomes for older patients with MBC. PATIENTS AND
methodsUsing a prospective database and targeted DNA sequencing (OncoPanel), we examined MBC's genomic landscape in older patients (age ≥70 years at MBC diagnosis) and compared findings with those in younger (aged <50 years) and middle-aged (aged 50-69 years) patients. After classifying single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variations (CNVs) as oncogenic (via OncoKB), the frequencies of SNVs and CNVs, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and oncogenic signaling pathways were compared by age group using Fisher's exact tests. We estimated the association between continuous age at MBC diagnosis and mutations via multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for race, stage at initial diagnosis, subtype, histology, and sample tested (primary versus metastatic).
resultsOur study included 2379 patients [853 (35%) younger, 1311 (55%) middle-aged, and 215 (9%) older] who underwent OncoPanel testing between 2013 and 2020. The most frequent tumor alterations in older patients were SNVs in PIK3CA (44%), TP53 (33%), CDH1 (22%) and amplifications in CCND1 (18%). After adjustment, older age was associated with higher frequency of SNVs in CDH1 [odds ratio (OR) = 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21-1.68, q < 0.001], MAP3K1 [OR = 1.30, 95% CI 1.10-1.54, q = 0.008], and PIK3CA [OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.11-1.31, q < 0.001] and fewer SNVs in TP53 [OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.91, q < 0.001]. Patients in the older group were more likely to have tumors with ≥10 mutations/megabase than the youngest patients (26% versus 17%, P = 0.003).
conclusionsIn this large cohort of patients with MBC, the tumor genomic landscape differed between older and younger patients even after accounting for tumor subtype. Older patients were more likely to have high-TMB and PIK3CA-mutated tumors, highlighting the importance of genomic testing for treatment applications in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.