ArticleESMO open2026
Lurbinectedin plus irinotecan in pretreated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: results of a phase II expansion cohort.
Article in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02611024 (Phase I/II, Multicenter, Open-label, Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lurbinectedin in Combination With Irinotecan in Pretreated Patients With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I/II, Multicenter, Open-label, Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study of Lurbinectedin in Combination With Irinotecan in Pretreated Patients With Selected Advanced Solid Tumors
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pooled safety analysis of lurbinectedin plus irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.Investigational new drugs · 2026Trial
- Lurbinectedin plus irinotecan in pretreated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: results of a phase II expansion cohort.ESMO open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA phase I/II trial (NCT02611024) evaluated the lurbinectedin 2.0 mg/m PATIENTS AND
methodsThirty-four patients with NENs (second line or greater) were included, 20 with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), and 14 with grade 2/3 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of digestive origin. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v.1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and pharmacokinetics.
resultsIn patients with NECs, the ORR with lurbinectedin plus irinotecan was 15.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2%-37.9%], the median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI 1.4-5.6 months), and the median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI 2.9-17.8 months). In patients with NETs, the ORR with lurbinectedin plus irinotecan was 7.1% (95% CI 0.2%-33.9%), the median PFS was 3.4 months (95% CI 1.4-8.9 months), and the median OS was 16.6 months (95% CI 3.9 months-not reached). The most common treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (nausea, 61.8% of patients; diarrhea, 44.1%; and vomiting, 35.3%), fatigue (58.8%), and decreased appetite (20.6%); these events were mostly grades 1 and 2. Grade ≥3 neutropenia was observed in 47.1% of patients and febrile neutropenia in 5.9%. Grade ≥3 transaminase increases were the most common severe laboratory biochemical abnormalities reported during treatment regardless of relationship to study drugs.
conclusionsThe combination of lurbinectedin plus irinotecan with primary granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis showed antitumor activity in GEP-NECs but limited activity in GEP-NETs. This combination had a predictable and manageable safety profile, with myelosuppression, gastrointestinal disorders, and fatigue as main toxicities. The lurbinectedin plus irinotecan combination deserves to be further explored in GEP-NECs after failure of platinum therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.