Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42735393›Full record

ArticleJMIR infodemiology2026

Characterizing Family Abuse in Suicidal Ideation Posts on Reddit: Large Language Model-Assisted Content Analysis.

Salim Sazzed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Salim SazzedGeorgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8552-5337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicidal ideation is a significant global public health concern, with family abuse recognized as a key risk factor. Although clinical studies have examined the link between family abuse and mental health, its representation in social media discussions-particularly in relation to suicidal ideation-remains largely unexplored.

objectiveThis study aimed to examine how family abuse manifests in suicidal ideation narratives on social media, focusing on the demographic characteristics of individuals reporting abuse, the types of abuse described, and relationships to perpetrators.

methodsWe analyzed 27,434 posts from the Reddit SuicideWatch forum to identify posts in which suicidal ideation and family abuse co-occurred. Using a combination of manual review, large language model-assisted keyword expansion, natural language processing-based information extraction, and human validation, we examined self-disclosed age and gender among Reddit users who reported family abuse in suicidal ideation posts, along with abuse types and relationships to perpetrators.

resultsAmong posts with self-reported age information, individuals aged 18 to 24 years accounted for the largest proportion (144/313, 46.0%). Among posts with self-reported gender information, men represented 57.3% (86/150). Physical abuse was the most frequently reported form of family abuse (683/975, 70.1%; 95% CI 67.18%-72.93%), followed by emotional or psychological abuse (350/975, 35.9%; 95% CI 32.89%-38.91%) and sexual abuse (296/975, 30.4%; 95% CI 27.47%-33.25%). The parent category was the most frequently identified perpetrator category (435/975, 44.6%; 95% CI: 41.52%-47.75%).

conclusionsThis study enhances our understanding of how family abuse appears in social media posts involving suicidal ideation. The findings demonstrate the potential of computational social media analysis to support descriptive, hypothesis-generating research and inform the design of online support resources for family abuse-related suicidal distress.

Indexed as

Social MediaSuicidal IdeationAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleYoung Adultdomestic violencefamily abuselarge language modelsmental healthRedditsocial mediasuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID42735393
PMCPMC13620435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.