SynthesisAge and ageing2026
Emergency department revisits and hospital readmissions following a fall-related emergency department presentation in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFalls are a leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits in older adults, yet subsequent trajectories of acute care use remain poorly characterised. We aimed to estimate pooled proportions of ED revisits and hospital readmissions at multiple follow-up intervals within 1 year.
methodsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD420251167449), we searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus from inception to 30 November 2025 for observational studies including adults aged ≥65 years presenting to the ED after an index fall. Eligible studies reported ED revisits and/or hospital readmissions within 1 year. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were conducted for each follow-up interval.
resultsNineteen studies (20 publications) were included, with overall low to moderate risk of bias. The cumulative proportions of patients experiencing an ED revisit increased with longer follow-up, from 3.9% within 3 days to 8.8% within 7 days, 15.0% within 30 days and 21.7% within 90 days (single study), reaching 37.5% at 6 months and 41.3% at 12 months. Hospital readmissions similarly increased from 10.4% at 30 days to 30.4% at 6 months and 31.9% at 12 months (single study). Substantial heterogeneity was observed across several pooled analyses.
conclusionA fall-related ED presentation is associated with substantial cumulative acute care use over the following year. Falls may represent an important marker of broader vulnerability and ongoing healthcare needs. Future research should identify patients at high risk of recurrent acute care use and determine whether targeted follow-up reduces recurrent ED visits and hospital readmissions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.