Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42735360›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2026

Reducing haystacks to needles-ViralClust: a Nextflow pipeline to cluster viral sequences.

Sandra Triebel, Kevin Lamkiewicz, Tom Eulenfeld, Manja Marz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sandra TriebelRNA Bioinformatics & High-Throughput Analysis Group, Institute of Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Inselplatz 5, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8999-4395
Kevin LamkiewiczRNA Bioinformatics & High-Throughput Analysis Group, Institute of Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Inselplatz 5, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6375-6441
Tom EulenfeldRNA Bioinformatics & High-Throughput Analysis Group, Institute of Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Inselplatz 5, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8378-559X
Manja MarzRNA Bioinformatics & High-Throughput Analysis Group, Institute of Computer Science, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Inselplatz 5, 07743 Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4783-8823

Funding

BMBF 031L0322HDFG 460129525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid accumulation of viral genome sequences presents major challenges for downstream analysis tools, including tools for multiple sequence alignments, phylogeny, and genome/alignment visualization, due to computational constraints and sampling biases caused by outbreak-driven over-representation. Selecting representative genomes through clustering offers a principled alternative to random subsampling, yet choosing appropriate clustering strategies remains non-trivial and context-dependent.

resultsHere, we present ViralClust, a modular Nextflow pipeline for bias-aware representative selection from large viral genome datasets. ViralClust integrates 5 distinct clustering algorithms (CD-HIT-EST, SUMACLUST, VSEARCH, MMSeqs2, and HDBSCAN) within a unified workflow, enabling direct comparison of clustering outcomes and flexible adaptation to diverse biological questions, considering a balanced phylogenetic distribution of the selected sequences. We evaluated ViralClust on 6 RNA and DNA virus datasets ranging from 632 to 156,586 sequences and spanning genome lengths from 890 to 197,185 nucleotides. Across all datasets, clustering reduced dataset size by ~95% or more while preserving genetic diversity across species, genera, and families, and effectively mitigating biases introduced by outbreaks, partial genomes, and sequence orientation artifacts.

conclusionsBy supporting whole-genome clustering and scalable representative selection, ViralClust enables efficient and reproducible downstream analyses that would otherwise be computationally infeasible. Rather than offering a prescriptive, guided analysis engine, our framework functions as a flexible comparative collection of complementary strategies, allowing users to empirically evaluate trade-offs and choose the ideal method tailored to their specific analytical endpoints.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenome, ViralGenomicsSoftwareVirusesAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsPhylogenybioinformaticsclusteringNextflowviral evolutionvirus

Identifiers

PMID42735360
PMCPMC13660479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.