ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Housing tenure, climate resilience, and ecological segregation.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The ecology of urban segregation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A key challenge to ensuring no one is left behind in the green transition lies in the persistent segregation of urban populations and the unequal distribution of environmental costs and benefits. Residential segregation has long reinforced socioeconomic and racialized disparities, and climate change introduces new dimensions to these injustices as adaptation policies increasingly shift financial and environmental burdens onto marginalized communities. While housing plays a central role in shaping exposure and resilience, the role of housing tenure-especially ownership arrangements beyond market logic-has received limited attention in just green transitions research. This study addresses this gap through a political ecology approach, combining spatial and policy analysis to examine the origins, distribution, and impacts of climate adaptation costs within Copenhagen's not-for-profit housing sector. Focusing on Hørgården, a stigmatized neighborhood targeted by Denmark's Parallel Society Law, the study shows how one-size-fits-all adaptation policies can inadvertently exacerbate existing urban inequalities. Findings highlight a missing link related to technomanagerialism, revealing how the interaction between housing tenure, segregation, and climate adaptation financing places disproportionate burdens on marginalized communities. The analysis identifies how institutional silos-particularly between technical and social policy domains-obscure structural drivers of inequality and produce uneven resilience outcomes. The paper offers a theoretical contribution by conceptualizing technomanagerialism as a critical yet overlooked mechanism of inequality within not-for-profit housing systems. It extends debates on climate burdens beyond market-based housing to demonstrate how inequalities become embedded even within ostensibly equitable systems, ultimately reinforcing patterns of urban segregation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.