Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42735238›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2026

Impact of Clinicopathological and Institutional Factors on the Clinical Courses of Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer Initially Managed by Active Surveillance: An Analysis of Nationwide Real-World Data From Japan.

Mizuki Onozawa, Masaki Shiota, Taketo Kawai, Shinichi Sakamoto, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Satoru Taguchi, Yasuhide Kitagawa, Tohru Nakagawa, Shiro Hinotsu, Jun Miyazaki and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mizuki OnozawaDepartment of Urology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9700-0274
Masaki ShiotaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3306-4858
Taketo KawaiDepartment of Urology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7279-2874
Shinichi SakamotoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7508-7521
Yoshiyuki YamamotoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1271-3521
Satoru TaguchiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1291-4294
Yasuhide KitagawaKitagawa UI Clinic, Komatsu, Japan.
Tohru NakagawaDepartment of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4041-7241
Shiro HinotsuDepartment of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3111-695X
Jun MiyazakiDepartment of Urology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3618-0432
Haruki KumeDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer (J‐CaP)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate active surveillance (AS) continuation rates and associated clinical and institutional factors in Japanese patients with localized prostate cancer.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 989 patients with localized prostate cancer from 92 institutions who initiated AS between 2016 and 2018. Institutions were categorized into three groups based on AS uptake for low-risk disease. Discontinuation triggers and subsequent treatments were examined.

resultsMedian age was 70 years; 66.2%, 26.0%, and 7.8% of patients had low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 3.4 years, 47.0% discontinued AS (median AS continuation time: 3.0 years; 5-year AS continuation rate: 33.7%). Multivariable analysis showed that ≥ 2 comorbidities, ≥ 3 positive biopsy cores, and T2b-c stage were associated with restricted mean continuation time differences (RMCTDs) of -0.6, -0.6, and -0.8 years, respectively (all p < 0.05). Conversely, intermediate- and high-AS uptake institutions had significantly longer adjusted RMCTD (1.0 and 1.1 years, respectively; both p < 0.001). Triggers for discontinuation were more often multifaceted in high-AS uptake institutions (39.1%) compared with low- or intermediate-AS uptake institutions (16.2% and 15.1%, respectively). After discontinuation, 36.5%, 39.2%, and 24.3% of patients received prostatectomy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy, respectively. With advancing age, the proportion of patients whose AS was discontinued due to PSA elevation increased, as did the rate of subsequent hormonal therapy.

conclusionsIn Japanese real-world practice, AS continuation was limited. Beyond clinicopathological factors, institutional strategies for localized prostate cancer played a significant role in treatment choices following AS.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsWatchful WaitingAgedAged, 80 and overBiopsyFollow-Up StudiesHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProstateProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenRetrospective StudiesProstate-Specific Antigenactive surveillance of prostate cancerdiscontinuationlocalized cancerprostate cancerreal world evidence

Identifiers

PMID42735238
PMCPMC13574298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.