ArticleIEEE transactions on ultrasonics2026
Spatial Coherence-Based Sound Speed Estimation in Plane Wave Ultrasound Imaging.
Article in IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A globally constant sound speed of 1540 m/s is often assumed when beamforming ultrasound images, despite variations in tissue properties that lead to heterogeneous sound speeds. As a result, the majority of local sound speeds are often misrepresented, which degrades image quality, resulting in inaccurate target depths, sizes, and shapes, thus reducing the overall effectiveness of diagnostic and interventional ultrasound imaging. In this article, we introduce a spatial coherence-based approach to estimate local sound speeds within and surrounding coherent and incoherent targets in ultrasound images acquired with multiple plane wave transmissions. Ultrasound data with known ground-truth sound speeds were simulated. "Optimal" sound speeds produced the lowest possible lateral full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of point targets, the lowest possible contrast of hypoechoic or anechoic targets, or the highest possible contrast of hyperechoic targets, serving as the ground-truth sound speed for experimental data. With our proposed method, sound speeds achieved 99.68-100% agreement with the simulated ground-truth value. When benchmarked against the optimal sound speeds, our coherence-based method yielded 0.58% and 0.56% mean deviations from optimal sound speeds in tissue-mimicking phantom data and in vivo breast data, respectively, whereas a speckle brightness maximization approach produced larger deviations of 2.50% and 3.41%, respectively. Qualitatively, B-mode images created with coherence-based sound speeds improved lateral FWHM, enhanced contrast, reduced acoustic clutter, better delineated target boundaries, and better defined speckle patterns. These results promise to improve accuracy and enhance the effectiveness of diagnostic and interventional ultrasound procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.