Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42734878›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026

Artificial intelligence in trigeminal neuralgia: trigeminal nerve segmentation and neurovascular conflict detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani, Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh, Bardia Hajikarimloo, Melika Javani, Shahin Mohammadzadeh, Ali Mortezaei, Amirhossein Zare, Farzad Fayedeh, Sai Sanikommu, Amirreza Khalaji and 7 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Mohammadamin Sabbagh Alvani *Skull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1233-4940
Ibrahim Mohammadzadeh *Skull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8862-0778
Bardia Hajikarimloo *Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Melika JavaniShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1658-0532
Shahin MohammadzadehSkull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali MortezaeiStudent Research Committee, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.
Amirhossein ZareNeurology Department, Tehran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3197-3562
Farzad FayedehStudent Research Comittee, Birjand University of medical sciences, Birjand, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-7972
Sai SanikommuDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Radiology, Neurosciences, Pharmacology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Amirreza KhalajiFaculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9909-1683
Mohammad Amin HabibiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7600-6925
Adam A DmytriwNeuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital & Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0131-5699
Farzan FahimSkull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0591-674X
Seyed Ali MousavinejadSkull Base Research Center, Loghman-Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. alimousavinejad65@gmail.com.
Ahmet GünkanDivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Qais AlrashidiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Pauline Braathen Neurological Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA.
Hamid Borghei-RazaviDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Pauline Braathen Neurological Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA. borgheh2@ccf.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a debilitating condition characterized by severe, episodic facial pain, often caused by neurovascular conflict (NVC) at the trigeminal nerve root. Early and accurate diagnosis of TN is crucial for effective management, with microvascular decompression (MVD) being a common surgical treatment. While MRI plays a key role in detecting NVC, its subjective nature limits diagnostic precision. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising tools for enhancing diagnostic accuracy. This study evaluates the potential of deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) models in improving TN diagnosis through automated segmentation and NVC detection in MRI scans. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies utilizing AI models in TN diagnosis. Studies assessing sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 5 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 577 patients with confirmed TN. The primary focus was on evaluating the performance of AI models in segmenting the trigeminal nerve and identifying neurovascular conflicts. The reference standard or target criterion used to define correct model performance was also extracted and considered, including expert imaging-based annotation, clinical-radiological diagnosis, and intraoperative confirmation where available. The pooled sensitivity of AI models in detecting TN was 71% (95% CI: 65-76%), with a specificity of 92% (95% CI: 88-94%). The positive diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) was 8.5 (95% CI: 5.75-12.56), and the negative DLR was 0.32 (95% CI: 0.26-0.38). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 26.71 (95% CI: 16.38-43.56), and the area under the curve (AUC) reached 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93). These findings demonstrate the high diagnostic accuracy of AI models, particularly in identifying NVC and improving preoperative planning for TN patients. AI models, particularly DL-based approaches, show promising diagnostic performance in the segmentation of the trigeminal nerve and detection of NVC. The high specificity and diagnostic odds ratio suggest that AI can play a critical role in enhancing clinical decision-making and improving the accuracy of TN diagnosis, ultimately aiding in better treatment planning for patients.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTrigeminal NerveTrigeminal NeuralgiaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicrovascular Decompression SurgeryArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDiagnostic accuracyMachine learningMeta-analysis.Trigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

PMID42734878
PMCPMC13574729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.