ReviewBioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy2026
Biosimilars: A Virtuous Cycle of Sustainability and Innovation.
Review in BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A biosimilar is a biological medicinal product developed to replicate a licensed originator-i.e., the reference product-with which it shares quality, efficacy, and safety. Marketed following expiry of the reference product's patent protection, biosimilars introduce competition that benefits patients and foster sustainability. In addition to such sustainability of healthcare systems, biosimilars confer a less widely recognized yet equally important benefit: they stimulate innovation. The European regulatory framework, pioneered by the European Medicines Agency and reinforced by other reference regulatory bodies, has unlocked this innovative potential. This paper examines how the development, manufacturing, commercialization, and clinical use of biosimilars generate advances in healthcare delivery. Drawing on available evidence and market experience, it proposes a classification of biosimilar-driven innovation into three domains: pharmaceutical innovation, technological innovation, and therapeutic innovation. Benefits wholly or partially attributable to biosimilars encompass both incremental and disruptive improvements within each domain. These include, for instance, the reinvestment of resources into novel therapies and technologies; therapeutic paradigm shifts supported by evidence and increasingly reflected in clinical guidelines; and enhanced formulations and delivery devices. Although relevant to all healthcare stakeholders, this paper is primarily directed at physicians. As key facilitators of biosimilar adoption, they will find that the innovative aspects of these medicines offer both compelling arguments to support broader prescribing and practical examples of how biosimilars can enhance clinical practice and improve patient outcomes.
Identifiers
42734875What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.