ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2026
Manufacturer-Perceived Development and Market-Entry Risks Associated with Discontinuation and Non-launch of Generic Medicines in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Marketing Authorization Holders.
Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGeneric medicines are essential for pharmaceutical affordability and access, yet some products are never launched or their development is discontinued even after patent expiry. Limited empirical evidence is available on how manufacturers perceive the development and market-entry risks associated with these outcomes.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify and structure manufacturer-perceived development and market-entry risk factors associated with generic medicine development discontinuation and non-launch in Japan.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of companies involved in generic medicine development and commercialization in Japan. The primary survey outcome was company-reported experience of development discontinuation or post-approval non-launch during fiscal years 2020-2024. Respondent characteristics were compared between companies with and without such experience. Among companies with such experience, development and market-entry risk factors were assessed in terms of both experience and perceived importance. All responding companies were asked to rate policy and regulatory options on five-point importance scales.
resultsAmong 122 companies with valid outcome data, 52 (42.6%) reported experience of development discontinuation or non-launch. Such experience was more frequently reported by companies with larger generic product portfolios. The market size and profitability domain was rated highest among the risk domains (top-2 box importance, 94.2%), but regulatory and clinical-study requirements (75.0%), formulation technology and manufacturing complexity (72.5%), and competition and institutional uncertainty (48.0%) were also rated as important. Among individual risk factors, active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) supply, patient-based bioequivalence or clinical-study requirements, dedicated equipment investment, and special formulation requirements were, in an exploratory descriptive map, among the factors with relatively high reported experience and perceived importance.
conclusionsGeneric medicine development discontinuation and non-launch in Japan were perceived by manufacturers as involving multiple development and market-entry risks extending beyond pricing to include API supply, manufacturing complexity, regulatory uncertainty, and competitive dynamics. Respondents prioritized reimbursement, regulatory, and manufacturing-related options for further consideration; the study did not evaluate the effectiveness, budget impact, or net social benefit of these options.
Identifiers
42734855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.