ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Ten-year outcomes of medical cannabis for chronic low back pain: opioid reduction, pain relief, and functional improvement in 1,000 patients.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate 10-year outcomes of medical cannabis therapy on opioid use, pain intensity, functional disability, concomitant medication use, and adverse events in cannabis-naïve chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients, with particular attention to clinically meaningful outcomes defined by established minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds.
methodsSingle-center longitudinal observational study of 1,000 consecutive cannabis-naïve CLBP patients from a registry database (2015-2024), reported following STROBE guidelines. PRIMARY OUTCOME: morphine milligram equivalents (MMEQ). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional disability, cannabis dosing patterns, adverse events, and concomitant medication use. Pre-specified MCID thresholds: ≥50% MMEQ reduction, ≥ 30% NRS reduction, ≥ 10-point ODI improvement. Statistical analyses included paired t-tests for completers and linear mixed-effects models for sensitivity analyses.
resultsOf 1,000 enrolled patients, 638 (63.8%) completed 10-year follow-up. Among completers, MMEQ decreased from 62.8 ± 35.7 to 6.4 ± 7.1 mg/day (- 89.8%, p < 0.001); NRS from 8.71 ± 1.23 to 1.37 ± 1.71 (- 84.2%, p < 0.001); ODI from 52.9 ± 11.9% to 36.8 ± 14.9% (16.1-point reduction, - 30.4%, p < 0.001). MCID responders: 91.2% for MMEQ, 96.6% for NRS, 62.1% for ODI. Substantial polypharmacy reductions occurred: tramadol/tapentadol - 84.0% points (pp), benzodiazepines - 73.5 pp, SSRIs - 71.9 pp, gabapentinoids - 30.7 pp. True tolerability adverse events occurred in 11.4% of visits; serious psychiatric events in 0.02%.
conclusionsIn this uncontrolled observational study, medical cannabis therapy was associated with reductions in opioid use, pain intensity, and functional disability over 10 years, accompanied by polypharmacy reduction and acceptable tolerability. Effect sizes substantially exceeded RCT benchmarks (e.g., - 0.6 NRS difference vs. placebo in a recent phase 3 trial), suggesting observational biases contribute to these findings. These hypothesis-generating data warrant validation in randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42734834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.