Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42734799›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2027

In Silico Drug Design of Chikungunya Antivirals: Using Consensus Methods for Virtual Screening.

Leandro Battini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Leandro BattiniStructural biology of infectious diseases G5+ unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France. leandro.battini@pasteur.fr.ORCID 0009-0008-9937-9212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structure-based virtual screening is an attractive strategy in drug design. It enables the selection of potential binders to target biomolecules with known molecular structures, providing a rational framework for studying their mechanisms of action and guiding further optimization. However, accurately predicting the free energy of binding remains an extremely challenging task, and the available tools only provide approximate estimates. In this context, one strategy to improve the predictive power of virtual screening and increase the probability of identifying true binders is to employ multiple docking algorithms and combine their results using a consensus method. In this chapter, we will describe a step-by-step methodology to perform this task. We will conduct a virtual screening using AutoDock Vina, AutoDock4, and LeDock, and then combine their results employing the Exponential Consensus Ranking algorithm. Finally, we will discuss possible extensions of this strategy, such as incorporating Molecular Dynamics simulations as an additional filter in the virtual screening or integrating the novel Artificial Intelligence-based methodologies into the consensus framework.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsChikungunya virusDrug DesignAlgorithmsComputer SimulationDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingSoftwareAntiviral AgentsAutoDock4AutoDock VinaChikungunyaConsensus scoringEnvelope glycoproteinsLeDockVirtual screening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.