ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2027
Computational Network Analysis for Defining Transcriptional Programs.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer cell identity is governed by coordinated transcriptional programs that are frequently rewired during tumorigenesis. Systematic identification of cancer type-specific gene regulatory networks provides a framework for understanding oncogenic state transitions and for prioritizing candidate therapeutic targets. Here, we present a reproducible network-based workflow for reconstructing and analyzing transcriptional regulatory programs across human cancer types using publicly available expression datasets. We describe procedures for curating and preprocessing microarray data from the Gene Expression Omnibus, implementing random forest classification, and reconstructing gene regulatory networks using the CellNet platform. Detailed guidance is provided for evaluating classifier performance, quantifying network influence scores, integrating transcription factor, target interaction resources, and performing functional enrichment analyses. In addition, we outline approaches for comparing cancer-specific networks with corresponding normal tissue profiles to identify candidate drivers of malignant cell identity and potential prognostic biomarkers. Together, these protocols provide investigators with a scalable computational framework for defining cancer type-specific transcriptional states and for systematically interrogating regulatory mechanisms underlying tumor heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42734742What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.