ArticleInfection2026
A machine learning approach for differential classification of chikungunya virus: an explainable AI study based on surveillance data.
Article in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMosquito-borne viral diseases such as chikungunya usually present similar clinical symptoms, which makes them hard to differentiate without laboratory confirmatory tests. Therefore, this work retrospectively developed interpretable machine learning models to improve the classification of chikungunya using routinely collected data.
methodsBrazilian surveillance data, with 18,127 records, were analyzed, and eight different machine learning algorithms were trained and five-fold cross-validated. In addition, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and permutation feature importance described model behavior.
resultsIn univariable analysis, arthralgia (OR = 5.84, 95% CI 5.39-6.33) and fever (OR = 5.85, 95% CI 5.29-6.46) were most positively associated with Chikungunya. The macro-AUC values ranged from 0.89 to 0.90 for all models in the multiclass analysis. The Chikungunya-versus-Non-Chikungunya task demonstrated moderate discrimination. The Chikungunya-versus-Dengue scenario produced the highest performance, with an AUC of 0.97 in most models.
conclusionThe explainability mechanism characterized how fitted models utilized available clinical and demographic predictors, with acute symptom variables contributing prominently to predictions. The results demonstrate the potential of using an interpretable model-assisted approach for arboviral classification. Importantly, prospective, temporal, and external geographic validation, with harmonized data, are required before clinical decision-support or point-of-care implementation can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42734738What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.