ReviewInfection2026
Oropouche virus infection: clinical spectrum, geographic expansion, and emerging maternal-fetal implications.
Review in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oropouche virus (OROV), an emerging arbovirus of the genus Orthobunyavirus, has become a growing public health concern following its recent expansion across the Americas and its potential to cause severe clinical outcomes in maternal and child health. Although Oropouche fever has classically been described as an acute self-limited febrile illness, accumulating evidence indicates that OROV is associated with meningitis and fatal infection, as well as evidence of vertical transmission associated with adverse fetal outcomes, including microcephaly and other congenital abnormalities, spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, and neuropathological alterations resembling those observed in congenital Zika syndrome. The OROV presents two transmission cycles, namely sylvatic and urban, with Culicoides paraensis as its main vector. The absence of specific vaccines or treatments, together with the wide distribution of competent vectors and the possibility of sexual transmission, underscores the urgent need to strengthen epidemiological surveillance, elucidate the mechanisms of fetal pathogenesis, and develop effective prevention and control strategies to protect vulnerable populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42734737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.