ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Patient-Reported Discharge Readiness After Cancer Surgery: A Multidimensional and Temporally Evolving Process.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: Artificial Intelligence in the Scientific Merit Review Process.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSafe and effective discharge after cancer surgery requires accurate assessment of patient readiness; however, current approaches largely rely on provider-defined criteria and may not capture the patient experience of readiness for home. The objective of this study was to identify key components of discharge readiness and examine their temporal relationships following cancer surgery.
methodsWe conducted a concurrent nested mixed-methods study at a single National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center of patients undergoing colorectal, thoracic, or gynecologic cancer surgery, all of whom had access to the Goals to Discharge electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) tool through an institutional pilot program. Qualitative interviews with a subgroup of patients were used to develop a conceptual framework of discharge readiness and classify milestones from the ePRO tool into physiologic, psychosocial, and operational domains. Longitudinal milestone responses were then analyzed to compare domain-specific recovery trajectories.
resultsQualitative interviews identified three domains of discharge readiness: physiologic, psychosocial, and operational. Quantitative analysis included 2,828 milestone assessments. Completion increased across all domains during hospitalization but progressed asynchronously. Physiologic and psychosocial milestones tracked closely, reaching 88% completion in the 6 hours before discharge, whereas operational milestones lagged, reaching 58%. These differences persisted after multivariable adjustment.
conclusionsFrom the patient perspective, discharge readiness after cancer surgery is a multidimensional and temporally evolving process. Operational readiness lags physiologic and psychosocial recovery, suggesting modifiable system-level barriers. Patient-reported, domain-specific assessments may improve the safety and efficiency of surgical discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42734700What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.