Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42734700›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Patient-Reported Discharge Readiness After Cancer Surgery: A Multidimensional and Temporally Evolving Process.

Antoinette R Esce, Jaime Gilliland, Lillian Boe, Marc A Cohen, Daniela Molena, Iris Wei, Vance Broach, Thomas M Atkinson, Jennifer R Cracchiolo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Antoinette R EsceHead and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jaime GillilandBehavioral Sciences Service, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Services, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lillian BoeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Marc A CohenHead and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Daniela MolenaThoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Iris WeiColorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Vance BroachGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas M AtkinsonBehavioral Sciences Service, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Services, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer R CracchioloHead and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. cracchij@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-906X

Funding

Integrating Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes into Discharge PlanningK08CA283306 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Jennifer R Cracchiolo · 2024 to 2026
$630k
CLC NIH HHS K08CA283306NCI NIH HHS NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSafe and effective discharge after cancer surgery requires accurate assessment of patient readiness; however, current approaches largely rely on provider-defined criteria and may not capture the patient experience of readiness for home. The objective of this study was to identify key components of discharge readiness and examine their temporal relationships following cancer surgery.

methodsWe conducted a concurrent nested mixed-methods study at a single National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center of patients undergoing colorectal, thoracic, or gynecologic cancer surgery, all of whom had access to the Goals to Discharge electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) tool through an institutional pilot program. Qualitative interviews with a subgroup of patients were used to develop a conceptual framework of discharge readiness and classify milestones from the ePRO tool into physiologic, psychosocial, and operational domains. Longitudinal milestone responses were then analyzed to compare domain-specific recovery trajectories.

resultsQualitative interviews identified three domains of discharge readiness: physiologic, psychosocial, and operational. Quantitative analysis included 2,828 milestone assessments. Completion increased across all domains during hospitalization but progressed asynchronously. Physiologic and psychosocial milestones tracked closely, reaching 88% completion in the 6 hours before discharge, whereas operational milestones lagged, reaching 58%. These differences persisted after multivariable adjustment.

conclusionsFrom the patient perspective, discharge readiness after cancer surgery is a multidimensional and temporally evolving process. Operational readiness lags physiologic and psychosocial recovery, suggesting modifiable system-level barriers. Patient-reported, domain-specific assessments may improve the safety and efficiency of surgical discharge.

Indexed as

CancerCancer surgeryDischargeDischarge readinessPatient-reported outcomesSurgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.