ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026
Fellow-eye retinal age gap and high injection burden over four years in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether fellow-eye retinal age gap (RAG), estimated using a deep learning model, is associated with long-term intravitreal injection burden in treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 80 patients with treatment-naive nAMD followed for ≥ 4 years after initiating anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Retinal age was estimated from fellow-eye fundus photographs using the publicly available Japan Ocular Imaging Registry model, and raw RAG was calculated as retinal age minus chronological age. Univariable analyses assessed associations of retinal age metrics with baseline ocular parameters, whereas univariable and multivariable analyses assessed their associations with 4-year injection burden.
resultsMedian chronological age, retinal age, and raw RAG were 67.6, 68.9, and 1.33 years, respectively. Retinal age correlated with baseline best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness, while raw RAG correlated with central choroidal thickness. Neither raw nor age-corrected RAG was associated with total injection number in the count analysis. In an exploratory threshold-based analysis, the ≥ 24-injection group had higher raw RAG than the < 24-injection group (4.19 vs. 0.66 years, P = 0.039), and higher raw RAG was associated with requiring ≥ 24 injections (OR 1.11 per 1-year increase; 95% CI, 1.01-1.22; P = 0.029). However, this association was attenuated after age correction and was not replicated at alternative thresholds.
conclusionHigher raw fellow-eye RAG was associated with the ≥ 24-injection threshold; the association was attenuated after age correction and nonsignificant in alternative-threshold and count analyses. Further studies should evaluate RAG as a fundus-based candidate marker of sustained high treatment burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42734658What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.