ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Improving Reliability of Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials with Physics-Informed Pretraining.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine Learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have emerged as powerful tools for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations with their competitive accuracy and computational efficiency. However, MLIPs often exhibit unphysical behavior when encountering configurations that deviate significantly from their training data distribution, leading to simulation instabilities and unreliable dynamics. This limits their reliability for materials simulations. We therefore present a physics-informed pretraining strategy that leverages simple empirical potentials to improve the robustness and stability of MLIPs for MD simulations. We demonstrate this approach through a pretraining-finetuning pipeline where MLIPs are initially pretrained on data labeled with embedded atom model (EAM) potentials and subsequently finetuned on the quantum mechanical ground truth data. Evaluation across three material systems (phosphorus, silica, and a subset of Materials Project) and three representative MLIP architectures (CGCNN, M3GNet, and TorchMD-NET) demonstrates that this physics-informed pretraining consistently improves both prediction accuracy as well as stability in MD compared to the baseline models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.