ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Data-Driven Critical Evaluation of the General Solubility Equation.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solubility is a widely measured physicochemical property and a highly sought-after descriptor in the evaluation of molecules for drug design and development, medicinal chemistry, and agrochemical sciences. Consequently, a wide range of in silico models based on deductive and inductive reasoning have been developed. However, the General Solubility Equation (GSE) stands out as a simple, thermodynamically derived equation to predict intrinsic solubility (log S0, in mol/L) of molecules from their melting point and n-octanol/water partition coefficient (log PN). Despite its widespread use, the applicability of this equation has not been rigorously evaluated to establish when it can or cannot produce accurate predictions. Therefore, a large-scale evaluation of the GSE was conducted using an extensive database of fully experimental melting point and log PN data for 2740, mostly drug-like compounds. A systematic analysis based on cheminformatics descriptors was conducted to identify the primary factors that allow the GSE to achieve predictions within the experimental uncertainty range (±1 log S unit). This information has been used to create GSESolver: a supervised machine learning classification model that, based on the selected descriptors, can predict whether the GSE will perform accurately solely from its SMILES string. GSESolver tool can be used by anyone in the scientific community to quickly assess molecule solubility and it was developed under the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) in a Google Colab notebook to ensure ease of use. Finally, the utility of the GSESolver tool was exploited in medicinal chemistry applications for the in silico prediction of the Maximum Absorbable Dose (MAD) of potential drugs, and in a rational agrochemical design application where solubility is a key factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.