ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
In Silico Decoding of Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Binding: Implications for Drug Design.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), a member of the steroid hormone nuclear receptor subfamily, mediates the effects of aldosterone and glucocorticoids. Initially characterized in epithelial tissues as a key regulator of blood pressure, MR was later found to be widely expressed across multiple tissues, where it mediates processes such as inflammation, oxidative stress, and fibrosis. Accordingly, MR antagonists (MRAs) have important clinical applications beyond their diuretic effect, forming a cornerstone in the treatment of chronic heart failure and showing promise in conditions like diabetic nephropathy. Nonsteroidal MRAs typically show fewer off-target effects than their steroidal counterparts, although the risk of hyperkalemia─especially in patients with renal impairment─remains a concern. A detailed understanding of MRA-binding modes is therefore crucial for the development of improved therapeutics. To this end, we conducted an extensive computational study integrating induced fit docking (IFD) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations across a comprehensive set of MRAs. This approach highlights key interactions responsible for binding affinity and offers insights into the molecular basis of selectivity and antagonism. Moreover, MD simulations revealed a potential link between the ligand interaction with Trp806 and coregulator recruitment. These findings provide a valuable foundation for in silico rational design of next-generation MRAs with enhanced safety and efficacy profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.