ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2026
Chemically Interpretable Explanations for Molecular Property Prediction via Fragment-Level Shapley Values.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cracking ERα Y537S Resistance: Explainable Machine Learning-Guided Discovery and Molecular Dynamics Validation of Stable Candidate Ligands.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning has emerged as a powerful approach for molecular property prediction and drug discovery. However, the black-box nature of many machine learning models limits their interpretability, trustworthiness, and adoption in interdisciplinary research settings. This is especially the case in molecular machine learning, where explanations of model predictions are used for informed decision-making and downstream tasks. Shapley values, originating from cooperative game theory, provide a principled framework for attributing model predictions to individual input features. However, existing Shapley value-based explanations for molecular machine learning often rely on sampling-based approximations or operate at the level of abstract features, which can reduce attribution stability and limit chemical interpretability and actionability. Here, we introduce a fragment-level Shapley value framework that enables the exact computation of feature contributions at the level of chemically meaningful fragments for molecular property predictions without relying on sampling or feature imputation. By decomposing molecules into fragments, the proposed approach yields actionable explanations that can be directly related to established chemical concepts. We apply the method post hoc to random forest and graph convolutional network models using common molecular representations, including extended-connectivity fingerprints and molecular graphs. The approach is evaluated across three representative property prediction tasks: aqueous solubility, mutagenicity, and antiviral potency. Fragment-level Shapley values reproduce well-established chemical trends, identify known toxicophores, and enable guided molecular optimization. In addition, the method provides insights into model learning characteristics and helps delineate the applicability domain, particularly in settings with limited and structurally biased data. Overall, this work demonstrates that adapting Shapley values to chemically meaningful fragments enables interpretable explanations for molecular machine learning models, supporting molecular optimization and model validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.