Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42734463›Full record

ReviewMedical gas research2027

Application of medical gases in prevention and treatment of electromagnetic radiation injury.

Yun Xing, Fengxu Chen, Gonggeng Liu, Shijun Bao, Xujian Zhang, Ziyi Guo, Zhaoyong Shou, Jiaming Guo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical gas research, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yun XingDepartment of Radiation Medicine, College of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Fengxu ChenDepartment of Radiation Medicine, College of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Gonggeng LiuDepartment of Radiation Medicine, College of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Shijun BaoDepartment of Radiation Medicine, College of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Xujian ZhangDepartment of Radiation Medicine, College of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ziyi GuoDepartment of Radiation Medicine, College of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhaoyong ShouFaculty of Health Service, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0002-1212-0395
Jiaming GuoDepartment of Radiation Medicine, College of Naval Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9898-237

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread proliferation of electromagnetic technologies in communications, healthcare, and daily life poses increasing risks of radiation-induced tissue injury. Mitigating these deleterious effects remains a formidable challenge. Recently, medical gases, including molecular hydrogen (H2), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon monoxide (CO), nitric oxide (NO), and hyperbaric oxygen, have emerged as a promising therapeutic modality with radioprotective potential. These gases exert their effects through integrated, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and mitochondrial-protective mechanisms. Specifically, the endogenous gasotransmitters (CO, NO, and H2S) modulate precise signaling networks, while the exogenous interventions (H2, and hyperbaric oxygen) function primarily through direct radical scavenging or the induction of hormetic stress responses. This review evaluates the research progress of these five medical gases in preventing and treating injuries across the electromagnetic spectrum. H2 possesses the broadest evidence base, particularly in radiofrequency and ultraviolet protection. H2S and CO demonstrate potent efficacy in addressing ultraviolet-induced skin and retinal damage. NO plays a dual role as both a cytoprotectant and a mediator of bystander effect propagation. Hyperbaric oxygen enhances systemic resilience through preconditioning. Delivery strategies have evolved from conventional inhalation and oral administration toward smart nanocarriers and stimuli-responsive donor systems. However, these platforms still face challenges in spatiotemporal control and long-term safety. Furthermore, broader limitations, including an uneven research distribution across electromagnetic wavebands, a scarcity of clinical trials, and the lack of non-invasive methods for real-time gas concentration monitoring, are comprehensively discussed.

Indexed as

Electromagnetic RadiationGasesRadiation InjuriesAnimalsCarbon MonoxideHumansHydrogenHydrogen SulfideHyperbaric OxygenationNitric OxideCarbon MonoxideGasesHydrogenHydrogen SulfideNitric Oxideapoptosisbystander effectclinical translationdelivery strategyelectromagnetic radiationgasotransmitterinflammationmedical gasoxidative stressradioprotection

Identifiers

PMID42734463
PMCPMC13667356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.