ReviewMedical gas research2027
Application of medical gases in prevention and treatment of electromagnetic radiation injury.
Review in Medical gas research, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread proliferation of electromagnetic technologies in communications, healthcare, and daily life poses increasing risks of radiation-induced tissue injury. Mitigating these deleterious effects remains a formidable challenge. Recently, medical gases, including molecular hydrogen (H2), hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon monoxide (CO), nitric oxide (NO), and hyperbaric oxygen, have emerged as a promising therapeutic modality with radioprotective potential. These gases exert their effects through integrated, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and mitochondrial-protective mechanisms. Specifically, the endogenous gasotransmitters (CO, NO, and H2S) modulate precise signaling networks, while the exogenous interventions (H2, and hyperbaric oxygen) function primarily through direct radical scavenging or the induction of hormetic stress responses. This review evaluates the research progress of these five medical gases in preventing and treating injuries across the electromagnetic spectrum. H2 possesses the broadest evidence base, particularly in radiofrequency and ultraviolet protection. H2S and CO demonstrate potent efficacy in addressing ultraviolet-induced skin and retinal damage. NO plays a dual role as both a cytoprotectant and a mediator of bystander effect propagation. Hyperbaric oxygen enhances systemic resilience through preconditioning. Delivery strategies have evolved from conventional inhalation and oral administration toward smart nanocarriers and stimuli-responsive donor systems. However, these platforms still face challenges in spatiotemporal control and long-term safety. Furthermore, broader limitations, including an uneven research distribution across electromagnetic wavebands, a scarcity of clinical trials, and the lack of non-invasive methods for real-time gas concentration monitoring, are comprehensively discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.